HIPSTER RUNOFF |
| Did Pitchfork Magazine ’sell out’ by giving Lady Gaga a high rating? Posted: 13 Jan 2010 11:26 AM PST
I feel confused. I always thought that pitchfork was an indie music site, but Lady Gaga is 0% indie. Maybe I am supposed to ‘appreciate her’ since her gimmick is artistic or something. Maybe Pitchfork is no longer an ‘indie site’ since they get mad hits, so they have to cover this type of stuff 4 ’search engine optimization’ purposes. Seems like p4k might be ‘going mainstream’, trying to get some emerging tween hits, or something. Still can’t believe she got a 7.8. I would ‘give my right arm’ for my buzzband to get a Pitchfork 7.8. Maybe Pitchfork should alter their rating system in the 2k10s. Possibly expanding the range from 0 to 11. Truly great albums in the 2k10s will sound nothing like great albums from any time before. I feel like they would generate a lot of buzz by doing this, especially if they called in the ‘AnCo rule.’ Really would be an effective way of communicating the quality + relevancy of an album. Previous Lady Gaga coverage |
| You are subscribed to email updates from HIPSTER RUNOFF To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |

